zkSync

Judging by the loud cries of millions of sybils on Twitter, zkSync chose the optimal criteria for filtering them out.

Is holding $100 in the ecosystem for a year not a fair criterion for a regular user?

In other airdrops, it might be POH with a well-established Farcaster or Lens profile. Are you ready for such changes?

😨 /fomies 🧐 /etherschool 📔 /diaries 💼 /hodler 🏋️ /gymvibes 🛫 /traveljunkie 🦜 /lingoleague

I think the distribution is unfair, the number of eligible wallets are many times less than other tier-1 projects (although ZK got record investments)

  The ratio between the least allocation and the biggest one (from 914 to 100k) is more than 100x, looks like a concentration not a decentralisation

Ex-Chemist, Defi enthusiast, investing popularisator
FID: 191419

As far as I know, the number of eligible addresses in Arbitrum was the same. The ratio in the Optimism drop was the same. The zkSync team said they love the Optimism distribution model 2 years before airdrop.

As far as I know OP and Arb users distribution are very different from the ZKSync users distribution but who cares... it's over. Time to move everything to base.