What makes an account "inauthentic"? 

We're considering a new labelling system for inauthentic accounts. These accounts, often incorrectly called bots, will be hidden from like counts and other metrics in Warpcast. 

Inauthentic accounts give real people the ick because they're clearly trying to get value for their account at the expense of everyone else on the network.

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

Short responses that either simply restate the op or provide no value

For example all of this person(bot?)'s posts

For example all of this person(bot?)'s posts

https://warpcast.com/warpcastenjoyer

i think I'm a bit torn on this

Wdyt abt eg responses like these on eg the rainbow post abt eth?

this is not fair
sometimes we just say something for support, like "congrats" "slay" "keep on" and ok that's not interesting but we need that kind of engagement and I'm happy to send it

yes especially responses that are short that say the same thing

Won’t the knock on effect be encouraging people with nothing to say to increase their verbiage?

Simply restating op as a short response indeed provides no value