dokodemodoor

Zora

the fundamental problem is really that content / art / whatever is not valued based on its intrinsic quality — one could argue that it *has* no intrinsic quality: beauty is in the eye of the beholder

rather art is valued contextually. aesthetic value is a factor, as is the "proof of work" involved, but a big big component is the status of the creator. and status is substantially mimetic (mimesis = imitation, in a sociological sense)

in other words, people like what they see other people liking. the more other people are liking it, the more they like it. that's how fashion works, across ~all domains (hipsters and snobs, AKA tastemakers, notwithstanding. insert Devil Wears Prada cerulean clip here)

so, Zora — nor any other platform — is not in a position to fix this and that would be an unreasonable expectation. the vast majority of artists, even really talented and hardworking artists, will always be obscure and unremunerated because attention is zero-sum and there's only so much of it to go around,

“绝大多数艺术家，即使是真正有才华和勤奋的艺术家，也永远是默默无闻和得不到报酬的，因为关注是零和博弈，而关注的数量是有限的”

以前跟大苗&卢西奥讨论过的问题，依然无解，在这个方面，在crypto/onchain上并没有什么不一样。

crypto是没有神丹妙药的，但在这里，普通/草根艺术家获得成就和收益的概率是其他地方的100x？好像这样也就够了

看了一些评论，这个有账可以算，有一部分的中小创作者，如果发 coin 的交易费大于他们直接卖作品的收入，那在 crypto 上发布并且发 coin 是 make senae 的。
但是现在这部分创作者还没被定位到，对应的会买他们 coin 的交易者画像也不清晰。就是事情理论上有可行性，但是得试、磨

嗯不过这是个系统性pivot的过程了哈哈，能有一部分愿意双边尝试就不错，最终也只是那部分有勇气和执行力尝鲜的人，先富起来