Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
🌹 zach harris 🥀
@zachharris.eth
File this under, fucking terrifying. Please forgive me and my naiveté but what is the strategic advantage of going public with this? Feels like something you and your administration wouldn't humble brag about.
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Proposed extra-naive benevolent conspiracy theory: this is "internal propaganda", someone saying this to convince _their own side_ to adopt some belief If I was a high-level deep state operative and I wanted to push to stop surveilling/hacking the world and instead support encryption for all, this is *exactly* the strategy I would take: make sure people learn about every single instance of US government databases getting hacked by foreign govs, so as to make the case that maybe the US government should just not have huge centralized databases of everyone's private data and we should keep data locally hosted and zk-prove things as needed
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
Would be pretty cool if somebody did harm like this to achieve some good outcome. I just can't but think that they would have done the exact same thing if the goal was to start a war instead.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
🌹 zach harris 🥀
@zachharris.eth
Could definitely be a Secret Service organized leak. They’ve had some challenges over the past couple of years and I believe are also responsible for counterfeit money and things directly related to our financial security. If there are members there that are still allegiant to Trump and against Biden, this would set him up very well strategically for his anti-China position.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
I do think that there is always potential for background orchestration that we are not so much aware of. In this case, all I wanted to say is, that V's suggestion above was only one possible alternative on the brighter end of the spectrum. And I do not think that it is very reasonable to assume we are manipulated by benevolent orchestrators. Possible, but not likely.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
