Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
Based on what Tushar is saying, he wants to live in a world in which users get exploited by MEV, because that is apparently what makes a successful business. MEV is certainly unavoidable, but you have a choice who gets that MEV. The users, from which that value is taken from, want that value to keep for themselves. And rightly so. Users will use chains that don't exploit them. Ethereum "gives up" on MEV because it is starting to give it back to the users. See CoW Swap. If Solana banks on MEV as revenue, it will subside eventually. Listening to what Tushar says for 2 minutes bombards me with 5 complicated assumptions within a single sentence, as if those assumptions were true. And Raoul is sitting there without saying anything. I cannot take this conversation seriously. Also, Raoul will be the first to unload his SOL for something else. Just like he unloaded ETH last cycle. Nothing wrong with that of course. Everyone should just know who they are listening to here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts2SplaztXs
1 reply
0 recast
18 reactions
Trashpirate
@trashpirate.eth
MEV is just an overall bad user experience. It exploits the most vulnerable users that are new to DeFi. That's not how you achieve mass adoption. Having the extracted value circle back to the users somehow is the least that's required. Or just all DEXs will implement MEV protection over time so there is less and less to extract.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction