Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Siddharth Raval pfp
Siddharth Raval
@raval--
What are some underappreciated EIPs according to you folks? I'd say EIP165
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Wesley— oss/acc pfp
Wesley— oss/acc
@wslyvh.eth
EIP-3074, true account abstraction https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3074
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What’s the diff between 4337?
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Wesley— oss/acc pfp
Wesley— oss/acc
@wslyvh.eth
‘True’ AA, might not have been the right words, but iirc it is the first AA proposal. 3074 is on protocol level so requires core dev. It delegates control, and a nicer path to get rid of EOAs 4337, as an app standard, doesn’t require a protocol change, but are basically SC wallets and relayers (Argent/Biconomy)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Siddharth Raval pfp
Siddharth Raval
@raval--
True, there is a lot of meta txn enabling stuff in there, erc20 gas payments and such. P.S. EOAs delegating control to contracts SOUNDS scary tbh xD
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction