Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Looking for people who are frustrated with the changes and new direction for channels. Last week, we got a lot of good feedback from people happy with / excited about the changes. See below. Now I want to highlight what's still not working for people. Specifically: 1. What's frustrating? 2. What would make it better? https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0xcf622e07
74 replies
144 recasts
464 reactions
WOO🎩
@woo-x
1. What's frustrating? There are too many channel owners who are inactive or absent, which slows down the overall engagement and growth of the channels. Additionally, the forced termination of the streak maintenance feature was discouraging for many users who used it as a motivation to stay engaged with FC. Lastly, when sharing a frame, it’s frustrating to realize later that I’m not subscribed to a channel, which forces me to cancel the cast. 2. What would make it better? A system to better manage inactive or absent channel owners would help keep channels active and engaging. It would also be great if there was a way to reintroduce the streak maintenance feature in some form, as it was a key motivator for many users. Finally, improving the UX by automatically checking if users are subscribed to a channel before allowing them to share frames would reduce the need to cancel casts.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
1. Can you give me examples of channels that you were participating in prior to the change that you can't today because the owner is inactive? 1a. How does sharing a frame and not being in a channel? 2. What's stopping you from starting another channel about a topic you care about?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
