To me, the biggest problem with "proof of human origin" is that "human-created" vs "AI-created" is a false binary. Most art and code I create involves many rounds of interaction between me and models. I suspect most interesting things made this decade will be like this

To me, the biggest problem with "proof of human origin" is that "human-created" vs "AI-created" is a false binary. Most art and code I create involves many rounds of interaction between me and models. I suspect most interesting things made this decade will be like this

https://x.com/trentmc0/status/1794333215290982702

That said, do your ideas also not stem from interactions with others and experiences you draw from externally?

It is said that we cannot conjure a truly 'original' thought or idea. It is impossible for us to do. So, in a way, we function just as the AI does through its complex process of combining ideas, no?