As previously discussed, we're considering renaming the Warpcast app to Farcaster.

Why?
- Top priority is grow users on the protocol
- The name split is extremely confusing for new users
- So, we want to simplify

How we're thinking about it
- Rename Warpcast mobile app
- warpcast.com to farcaster.xyz for web app
- Open source both apps
- No change protocol name, i.e. similar to Uniswap with app / protocol

What we’re doing
- Seeking input and want to make sure we understand concerns 
- Ultimately Varun and I will make a decision; it won’t be a vote.
- Expect a decision in the next week or so; if yes, we will give plenty of notice and will take time to do this correctly / cleanly.

How you can provide input
- Developers: please reply here or feel free to reach out to me via direct message whether you agree or disagree.
- Everyone else: you're free to offer input, but we will be weighting developer input a bit more since it has a bigger near-term impact on what they are building

i'm pro the name change (as a client dev / not dan's employee / im not being held hostage)

why:
- i decided to build supercast because farcaster provided good enough distribution and good enough tech
- the name change doesn't change the tech
- the name change can potentially cut distribution for other clients BUT it will net more distribution in long term

on distribution

2 names is too confusing for global push

it could work if the app name was cool and protocol name was lame

but our protocol name is cool and recognizable

so it will have to serve as the app name too