woj
@woj.eth
new zora model is different from what we have seen so far and it causes disappointment but imo it's the purest thing we had so far: a picture has a marketcap people will be mad that they can't profit off of someone's brand the way they could in the world where everyone is supposed to have max 1 token and they are supposed to promote it all the time (btw it will be the same list of people who made money on $ANON while producing no work) but the vibe will change once something organically goes to $1m and then to $10m and suddenly it will create a new tradable meta and people will be able to trade it again
10 replies
3 recasts
25 reactions
jalil
@jalil.eth
it's interesting but how is 1155 not a more natural home for an identifiable but networked (owned by many) artifact? just because protocol application integrations for the casino are better for erc20s - slap an imageURI on the contract and deploy a new one for each post?
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
woj
@woj.eth
conceptually nfts make more sense, but the reality is that everything these days depends on a liquidity pools, specifically uniswap liquidity pools — and they depend on erc20
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jalil
@jalil.eth
what exactly is dependent on liquidity pools? because it's certainly not for the core mission (people want to support creators). or at least what i thought the mission was...
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
woj
@woj.eth
i don't think "people want to support creators" materialized in crypto so far people thought it did but in the end it was always risk capital looking for the next opportunity > what exactly is dependent on liquidity pools? the asset counting in the phantom portfolio screenshot, the most important UI right now
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jalil
@jalil.eth
many examples of genuine support imo i bought the super subscription to support you and your development of it. the people who have minted this did it for no other reason; certainly nothing to gamble on cause i'll keep forever inflating my supply (just like any artist/dev should) https://mint.jalil.cc/0x03cd89170b64c9f0a392246a2e4a0c22fcd23a5b/1 > the asset counting in phantom ... exactly my point. has nothing to do with supporting creators and hence the original mission. still convinced it's a confused move and in service of fee extractors than in support of the creator economy.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
