Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

​woj ツ pfp
​woj ツ
@woj.eth
warpcast != farcaster farcaster network activity dropped by 50% yesterday probably because warpcast wasn't sending data to the protocol for a long time if you care about decentralization, use alternative clients like @lolwildcard @yup @recaster-fc or yours truly, @super
27 replies
28 recasts
186 reactions

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
If someone was casting via Supercast during the sync issue, their casts would not appear on Warpcast, correct?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

​woj ツ pfp
​woj ツ
@woj.eth
surprisingly, these issues are usually one-directional, and this one was too supercast-created content appeared in warpcast normally
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Interesting, I did not know this. I thought it applied to both read and write. I'm guessing that what happened yesterday is related to the same sync issue we've been discussing recently. If I unfollowed someone on Warpcast yesterday, that action would not have been registered by the hubs?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction