Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
woj
@woj.eth
degen and ham chains were mistakes and they set the whole farcaster ecosystem back im posting this after reaching out to @jacek and @deployer privately, but since they both answered that they have no plans on sunsetting the chains, i want to give a heads up to all other teams building their economies on farcaster: don't launch you own chains 1. fc ecosystem only has a chance to work if there is a lot of liquidity in one place 2. separate chains fragment the liquidity and only benefit the passive token holders (less sell pressure) and mev bot operators (arbitrage between chains and pools). actual users pay in UX, mev and fees 3. devs who want to launch integrations with these projects are fucked because most infrastructure providers don't support these small chains im building supercast wallet and it's beyond frustrating to see how close we were to having something truly great and how much harder it is to build a good UX on top of these projects because they selfishly decided to launch their own chains
75 replies
58 recasts
380 reactions
woj
@woj.eth
also doesn't serve me to say this because i have money in both projects, and it probably costs me some friendship points with jacek and deployer but i feel very strongly about this and i want others to avoid following this path just build on base, it's already hard enough
8 replies
6 recasts
173 reactions
Arti Villa | IRL at Devcon⟠⟠
@artivilla.eth
i would even go as far as say just build on any super chain. they all use the same tooling. i probably will loose friendship points as well as i worked at cb, but gotta done some sustainable model than just taking funds from a corp. activity and fees generated on the chain helps fuel the developer ecosystem. not everyone wants to take charity or sponsorships.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
wizard not parzival
@alexpaden
it enables gaming at a more obscure layer, the same as as paypal enabled payments that others might not have for many years (imo) though liquidity is a valid argument
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Hoot 🎩 ↝ ZuThailand
@owl
I still believe there’s a place for a “farcaster L3” that is easy and cheap to access and well integrated in ecosystem apps. Frame chain tried it, then degen, then ham, iirc there’s another chain going right now. The problem with all of them like you’re saying they don’t have the infra or enough incentive for projects to go through the hassle of building on them.
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
𝖉𝖞𝖈𝖕¹ᵍ
@tn100x.eth
Inbefore degen layer 4 😠
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
joobid.base.eth
@joobid.eth
We are with you, someone (else) had to say it
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
it's fine if it's abstracted like typical apps have their own databases but it isn't abstracted at all and you need to bridge funds back and forth all the time
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Pablofb
@pablofb
I understand your point of view and I also think that you are absolutely right and really brave to say this. 1000 $DEGEN (even if they are delivered to you on another network) Cc @joobid.eth
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ionspired
@ionspired
Thanks for saying it out loud. Many people haven't even thought re Degen that way. However, we should always take in account this "diversity gravity", it will always be the case that people start forking from a direction if they disagree with it. That's what decentralization we build is, isn't it?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
