(2/2) 

Once real customers exist, you need the freedom to experiment, iterate, and pivot with as few constraints as possible. 

DAOs aren't able to achieve operational excellence. Leadership is needed to hold the team to a high bar and ensure accountability. If there is an underperformer, you need to be able to remove them fast and without public debate. DAOs become bureaucracies that move slow and can't compete in a fast paced environment.

“DAOs become bureaucracies that move slow and can't compete in a fast paced environment.”

Is this 100% true? 

How would you design a DAO to specifically compete in a fast paced environment? (without using centralization)

Any suggestions?

subDAOs! in theory can design a DAO to look exactly like a centralized org, only with token holders instead of shareholders (if that's what the community wants). or, with many [subDAO] leaders rather than one leader (tbd how well this works tho)

cointelegraph.com/innovation-circle/dispelling-the-flat-dao-myth

Casting thoughts about decentralization and magic &
hanging out in /publicnouns /nouns /investment-daos 

Buidl the change you wish to see in the world. Customize your space on /nounspace, download @shapeshift, donate on @giveth, pick up @trashnfts #bestdayever

Yes. Love idea of subDAOs. 

And better designs/tools for delegation & evaluation.

💯 and maybe some core primitives that are still missing like private voting.

+ we've barely scratched the surface for how AI can play a role.

excited to see what the next decade holds for DAOs. pretty cool that we get to witness the next evolution of human coordination get built right in front of our eyes 😎

my man 💜 it takes more than believing to make it happen, but in order to make it happen, we first need to believe! 🦾 

onchain orgs + smart contracts > offchain orgs + dumb contracts