@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
onchain social credit score unlocked (derogatory) in all seriousness i agree. we are at the cutting edge of onchain social so we use what's available, but i'm confident we will come up with more democratized and fair solutions to sybil soon enough
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
Imo the future is you can bring your own algo to any content platform and reindex the content Most people will go with defaults defined by others, but this doesn’t necessarily mean the platform Here’s an example where you can create your own feed based on an attestation: https://cartographer-mini-app.vercel.app/
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
patxol 🔷 anser.social pfp
patxol 🔷 anser.social
@patxol.eth
I think @bleu.eth 's issue is that he does not qualify for /larry as he does not have a high enough Neynar Score. You can already bring your own social score anywhere, even build your own. /larry decided to pick Neynar, they could have picked OpenRank or made their own, or just go with power badge or whatever. I don't think the black box nature of Neynar scoring is the problem here.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
is openrank available onchain?
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
patxol 🔷 anser.social pfp
patxol 🔷 anser.social
@patxol.eth
Not that I know. Definitely a good reason to pick neynar. I didn't know that the check was happening at contract level 👏
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
I do think a centralized algo model has inherent limitations for social We have never really had decentralized algorithmic building blocks for social before so we don’t realize this is a serious limitation But take qBuilder attestation from Icebreaker for example- anyone who’s a qBuilder can induct another person. This leads to recursive dynamics where there are many paths to become a member. In the future, we will make it easy for people to create their own attestation groups with custom propagation logic. All of it is verifiable onchain too. We are super super early but it’s these new flexible + decentralized + recursive models that I’m most excited about when it comes to interoperable identity
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
patxol 🔷 anser.social pfp
patxol 🔷 anser.social
@patxol.eth
I agree that the decentralized Legos is great. However, I see no problem in building black boxes from these Legos.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
Yes, same Nothing intrinsically wrong with black boxes. Sometimes they are the right answer. I just like having options. Both in boxes and in legos. Previously both were ecosystem-locked.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@lsankar.eth recently posted on the idea of indistinguishability obfuscation Maybe he can expand on how he sees this being applied generally in crypto. I was thinking about this in the context of a credential like qBuilder- Icebreaker operates as a platform for propagating the credential, but technically anyone else can propagate or recreate the web by following the same rules which are governed by the definition. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indistinguishability_obfuscation
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction