Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Cool new Farcaster app: @fireflyapp https://warpcast.com/fireflyapp/0xf92f0fba
5 replies
10 recasts
31 reactions
accountless
@accountless.eth
@suji and team way to go ;) also has DID yes? cc @web3pm
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Suji Yan
@suji
Yep DID at next.ID
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
So this relies on willingness to connect all accounts publicly via next id on arweave, correct? That’s cool you can surface everything together. What version of did do you use btw?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Suji Yan
@suji
Personally I tried all available ones even blockstack lol. Imo in real world user only care UIUX + content + privacy (when ask)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
What if the truly game changing use cases for identity can only be achieved once we discard the assumption that privacy isn’t important?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Suji Yan
@suji
Imo there are two parts of privacy and the goal is to enhance to overall privacy added together. So have to sacrifice privacy part1 to enhance part 2. Example of Part 1 including PKI’s pub key / key Server / keybase like system; so part 2 the content privacy can be protected
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Suji Yan
@suji
The only way to keep both parts privacy without any trade off is to end the regime of nation state govts. Which is not an immediate play Blockchain basically sacrifices p1 to get more p2 so other players come later can improve both parts and eventually achieve the goal
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
Don’t think forcing public registries for stuff we don’t want public (which may include associations) is the entire answer. Also p1 and p2 can be independent
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
accountless
@accountless.eth
imo it’s always a fluid trade off or should be the goal. it’s a state which continuously changes, and best when user can choose (like driving stick shift vs manual)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
