Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nicholas Charriere pfp
Nicholas Charriere
@pushix
Does diversity matter for network states? Intuitively to me it does, since living with only men doesn’t sound like it would work well. I feel like ignoring this is a deficiency of the framework, what do you think? Cc @balajis.eth
12 replies
1 recast
11 reactions

web3dΞv.eth | sonsOfCrypto.com pfp
web3dΞv.eth | sonsOfCrypto.com
@web3d3v
I dont think diversity matters at all. As long as no one is actively excluded. We are good. Getting network state off the ground is going to be uphill battle as is. There is no need to get bogged down with woke non sense. Every single western state is obsessed with diversity, so there are plenty of places for that
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
"No one is actively excluded" is a higher bar than many people think! Basically means that network states need to be located in one of a small number of countries that most people around the world can come to without onerous visa requirements.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

web3dΞv.eth | sonsOfCrypto.com pfp
web3dΞv.eth | sonsOfCrypto.com
@web3d3v
My answer assumed some level of sovereignty of migration policy would be achieved
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
I do think this is a high bar to assume; I predict that the pressure to be lazy and not even try, scaling down ambition to "let's not bother with autonomy from federal law and focus on local stuff like building codes so we can get to an MVP", is going to be strong
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction