Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
> when everything becomes a token, nothing has value Pre-internet generating public content was hard / expensive. And thus we had a finite supply. The median internet post is worthless. There is an infinite supply of them. Some posts are valuable, though. And in aggregate, all internet posts are far more valuable than pre-internet content. The valuable companies surface and distribute the most valuable posts through feeds, i.e. concentrating attention. The issue has been until recently, tokens were relatively hard to create, so there was a limited supply. As that's gotten 10x easier (and will continue to get easier), we haven't really adapted both the tools and norms around it. At the limit, there will be an infinite supply of tokens. Most will be worthless. And some will be valuable.
8 replies
4 recasts
41 reactions
EdisonChen不是陈冠希
@edisonchen
So how should we value a piece of content? Is it based on whether it is an interesting idea or who published it? Is it based on the quality of the content itself or who has complied with the rules of the information distribution platform?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yuuu
@web3-yuuu.eth
很难,而且不论是token化定价还是像现在一样给内容广告分成/直接带货,本质上奖励的都是流量和传播而不是内容本身。目前看只有直接付费订阅或者打赏才是奖励内容本身,不直接依赖传播。
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction