Content
@
https://ethereum.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
EF should have supported ZK startups with social capital but they never did all the ZK startups are dying in real time if Ethereum was as cypherpunk as it wants to be, these projects would not have been abandoned
12 replies
5 recasts
27 reactions
Rueđź—˝
@rue1776
How are they dying? ZKsync just became the first rollup to process more transactions than ETH in a month
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
any non-rollup zk products that are not dying? like, i don't know, anything consumer besides tornado cash?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Rueđź—˝
@rue1776
ZKP2P, Zkemail, and @getclave come to mind right away. But there are much others that aren’t specifically “zk startups” that use the tech For instance, The Graph uses zk tech to provide deterministic queries
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
with all the respect to zkemail team, the sheer fact that you're mentioning them in the top-3 picks is precisely the issue zkemail is a great poc that is unusable by almost anyone there were many (many) more promising teams that got zero support and since then dissolved any more examples?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Rueđź—˝
@rue1776
You asked for one’s that aren’t dying. Not ones that have product market fit. By that measure most of crypto is “dying” The most notable zk project to me personally is Aztec. It’s a rollup sure, but if they can actually unlock privacy that’s huge. What exactly are you looking for when you say support?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
exactly what i'm saying in the original cast: sharing social capital, not abandoning all the zk startups into the void
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rueđź—˝
@rue1776
I mean, how has the EF supported non-zk startups differently and kept them from the void?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
