Referring just to the LRT tickers here, not to mention LSTs and DeFi counterparts.

We got: eETH, ezETH, ETHx, genETH, pufETH, uniETH, rETH, reETH, smETH, instETH, restETH, mETH, elETH, rrETH, csETH, OETH...

Wouldn't adopting a different naming convention, similar to what StakeStone did with $STONE, make more sense?

analyst | Workin' on the weekend like usual | Building redstone.finance

PhD in aviation ∩ climate science | Aviator, diver, ETH maxi, nexialist | Host of /diving /ethfinance /eth-staker /geopolitics /science /singapore /thomas

You wouldn’t have guessed it, given we're accustomed to every ETH synthetic featuring "ETH" in its name and ticker. Just pondering, is this the right approach for the long term?

It sure does get confusing.

But having never heard of $STONE until just now, I wouldn’t have guessed from the name alone that it was an ERC-20 LST (or LRT?). I would have assumed just a regular obscure altcoin.

Maybe something like ETH-Stone, ETH-Etherfi, ETH-RocketPool, etc?

Restake with rswETH and join Swell L2.

Stake now to earn pearls: app.swellnetwork.io

you forgot @swellnetworkio and swETH / rswETH

Imagine declaring meth sales on your tax return.

Na, i want to open up the top 100 and see only eth.