EthFinance

Referring just to the LRT tickers here, not to mention LSTs and DeFi counterparts.

We got: eETH, ezETH, ETHx, genETH, pufETH, uniETH, rETH, reETH, smETH, instETH, restETH, mETH, elETH, rrETH, csETH, OETH...

Wouldn't adopting a different naming convention, similar to what StakeStone did with $STONE, make more sense?

analyst redstone.finance | Workin' on the weekend like usual

It sure does get confusing.

But having never heard of $STONE until just now, I wouldn’t have guessed from the name alone that it was an ERC-20 LST (or LRT?). I would have assumed just a regular obscure altcoin.

Maybe something like ETH-Stone, ETH-Etherfi, ETH-RocketPool, etc?

PhD in aviation ∩ climate science | Aviator, diver, ETH maxi, nexialist | Host of /diving /ethfinance /eth-staker /geopolitics /science /singapore /thomas

To be honest, I for one don’t feel that I “need” to know what every flavor of *ETH is out there nor recognize it, because I usually start from a project (e.g., Etherfi) and end up with their token (eETH), and never the other way around — seeing a token symbol and trying to figure out what project it belongs to

You wouldn’t have guessed it, given we're accustomed to every ETH synthetic featuring "ETH" in its name and ticker. Just pondering, is this the right approach for the long term?