Reid DeRamus pfp
Reid DeRamus
@reidtandy
It's probably dumb / silly, but I'm really quite allergic to the word "content". I think this feeling really emerged listening to the interview linked below w/ Ted Gioia and Mike Solana. https://read.substack.com/i/120703046/mike-on-content The tricky part is what to use / say instead...
8 replies
3 recasts
27 reactions

Callum Wanderloots ✨ pfp
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
I think that content is less about the… contents of the content.. and more about the container of the context of the content Ie, sharing writing is writing, its beautiful, its thoughtful, its long form… if it’s on @paragraph, or a website, or a journal, or a digital garden.. etc. But! Taking that same writing and converting it into the context of social media, it now becomes a constrained idea within the confines of the “box” of the post (or cast). The sole purpose is to promote the brand/long form writing, but it’s submitted to the chaos stream of social media as literal “feed” to the algorithm. In that sense, it’s part of the grind, the mill of social media, that needs to be continuously shared if the creator has any hope of reach/engagement, breaking through the noise. So in that sense, in an algorithmic world, I think it’s actually helpful to bifurcate content into its own style of creation, because it’s not the value in and of itself, it’s what points to the value
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions