Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
A reminder on channels - Channels are *not* decentralized yet - Do not squat channel names with the intention to sell them to brands later; this is extractive behavior - When channels are decentralized and incorporated into the protocol later this year (likely onchain!), then you can do what you want! Just like FIDs
0 reply
29 recasts
282 reactions

Wall Street Guy 🚨 pfp
Wall Street Guy 🚨
@wallstreetguy.eth
I understand what are you trying to do, but for me it is not necessary at all: 1) We used to have Facebook squater, Twitter squater,... it is a fair competition for everyone. If the squatter actually build a good channel, the brand will soon buy back/ fund for the channel to keep operating.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Wall Street Guy 🚨 pfp
Wall Street Guy 🚨
@wallstreetguy.eth
2) if they are bad squatters, and do nothing else, the channel will soon eliminated and ignore by the community. The legit channel with professional marketing strategy/ contents will replace them in community' sense 3) Increase the fee to maintain a channel if you don't want squatter take them
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Wall Street Guy 🚨 pfp
Wall Street Guy 🚨
@wallstreetguy.eth
4) give real-active channel "active badge" to eliminate the fakers
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction