Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jacek.degen.eth 🎩 pfp
Jacek.degen.eth 🎩
@jacek
Since some over-stake Degen, part of the tip allowance pool becomes unavailable to everyone. Any ideas on a fair way to distribute those locked tip allowances to both over-stakers and other users? Someone staking a few million Degen should get some perks. We’d love to hear your thoughts!
77 replies
15 recasts
117 reactions

wake pfp
wake
@wake.eth
Per @reneecampbell, maybe it's as simple as just sharing the whale overstake among the bottom most stakes (ie, 10k stakes) evenly. No one would get much and nothing would be wasted by whale aggression. Lift the bottom, headwind for the top.
15 replies
2 recasts
32 reactions

Renée Campbell 🎩 pfp
Renée Campbell 🎩
@reneecampbell
Exactly! The top don’t need any extra perk. We all knew what the limit was set at.
5 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Metaphorical pfp
Metaphorical
@hyp
i’d just spread it evenly to allocation of all accounts under 10k allocation
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Brian 🌎☮️ 🎩 pfp
Brian 🌎☮️ 🎩
@bp
I was going to suggest exactly this. It's the answer. Help the little guys participate and keep degen present everywhere here.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

MM pfp
MM
@listen2mm.eth
This is the way… or the Wake? Easy for me to say as a firm member of the bottom
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sinaver pfp
Sinaver
@sinaver.eth
++ like this!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

HankMoody 🎩  pfp
HankMoody 🎩
@hankmoody
This proposal is excellent, thank you !!!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Maning🎩 pfp
Maning🎩
@maning
This! Otherwise people wont stake just because the pool is too big
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Manu Williams 🎩🔵💎 pfp
Manu Williams 🎩🔵💎
@manuwilliams
That’s a great solution! 👌🏼
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

MattwithouttheT 🎩 pfp
MattwithouttheT 🎩
@mathew
Why not just remove the over staked amounts from the equation in determining all other staker’s share of the tipping pool? Honestly, that’s how I thought it was going to work in the first place until I saw Jacek’s message confirming any excess stake locks up that share of the allowance pool…
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Jacek.degen.eth 🎩 pfp
Jacek.degen.eth 🎩
@jacek
100 $DEGEN
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

RJ (replyor) pfp
RJ (replyor)
@shulzzz
This encourages small stakes, which isn't exactly what you want. My vote is to simply cap it in the algo at whatever pool % ownership it would be if they hit their max allowance and nothing more.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Sinaver pfp
Sinaver
@sinaver.eth
500 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ξric Juta  pfp
Ξric Juta
@ericjuta
degen communism article inspired?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Sunny pfp
Sunny
@sunnysangwan
If a step change at the bottom doesn't work (for whatever reason) then a logarithmic increase towards the bottom could also be done. Everybody who staked gets rewarded, the bottom gets the most.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction