derek
@derek
o3 doesn’t seem that groundbreaking to me. It seems iterative. We’ve known that computers are “smarter” than us. Since the 80s. That’s why we use them. Let me know when these models show *intention* and *creativity*. That’s what makes us different. Until then they remain really, really, really good word predictors.
6 replies
0 recast
15 reactions
wake
@wake.eth
well said and agree. they all “feel” the same to me after a bit of use. hollow repackaging of human intellectual goods, averaged, smoothed, and banal. Useful for trite timewasters, otherwise *just a computer.*
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
derek
@derek
They definitely “feel” the same. I do think they have some new use cases because of the speed and increased complexity. I use them daily and they do increase my productivity. But the hallucinations and wrong information are great reminders of their shortcomings. Until I ask it “where do you want this conversation to go?” And it responds with something other than a version of “I’m just here to be helpful”, I’m not wowed.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction