Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Brian Flynn
@flynn.eth
Has anyone tried to build a Farcaster builders collective where Farcaster builders can share upside in each other's projects and funding is only done from members of the collective? Feels ripe for opportunity assuming token/acc continues to happen
16 replies
14 recasts
78 reactions
will
@w
believe something like this will emerge organically from our design, likely later this year? although I don't actually think it should be a collective, just builders funding builders
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
Brian Flynn
@flynn.eth
what's the difference between builders funding builders and a collective? feels like the collective can also do revshare between projects. of course need opt in from projects from the onset
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
will
@w
each builder chooses their own cap table
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Brian Flynn
@flynn.eth
My personal preference is that its better to have infinite number of stakeholders above a certain quality and skin in the game rather than a small chosen group Ie. echo is doing well
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
will
@w
yeah i think echo is great i don’t think i said anything about the size, just the flexibility for the builder to decide themselves i do think most people on existing cap tables don’t contribute much, and i think a collective where everyone is automatically included for a small amount would make that worse
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brian Flynn
@flynn.eth
what if it was like equity swaps? ie. we got $split fees for being a splits team customer. make all your customers aligned with your growth
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
