w-g pfp

w-g

@w-g

21 Following
286 Followers
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
https://t.co/Lf9dHWLKMF Always inspired by builders building but this is toxic for $btc and toxic for $eth The right protocol would be the exact inverse of this. Ethereum could be at its strongest while Bitcoin is licking its wounds instead of complacently injecting itself with the same virus as its idiot brother How anyone can look at saylor and say “I want this in my network” is beyond me. Create an efficient capital aggregation tool to facilitate an aligned network-scale bet on the thing we all know is coming. That’s how we win I’ll offer $10m seed liquidity if anyone wants to help make it real
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
i like pwease. Kind of sad we can’t run tipping/contests on here. anyone interested in bridging it over?
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
@vitalik.eth unsure if you are attending tmrw but one thought is to propose - rather than inflating the $ to buy coins - running a pilot to tokenize the treasury auction/mkt; no middlemen, instant settlement, fractional access, 24/7 global liquidity (you know, that programmable money thing you invented..) seems like an aligned way to drive innovation that would clearly save taxpayer $
0 reply
32 recasts
140 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
imo there’s little doubt that owning ether is to a certain extent an act of resistance. anyone here looking to align themselves with this administration is just in the wrong network
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
design/deploy durable meritocratic governance systems controlling progressively greater % of network resources . resist capital - structurally
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
The protocol adopting >=1 demonstrably meritocratic mechanism . more than any other ideological direction the population will begin to more closely map to the state & Milton Friedman can ultimately find repose in obsolescence
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
So the 1 member is the only beneficial owner? Help me understand, for example, what happens if there are inquiries or enforcement actions. Seems like a high-risk position? Very different from a duna admin would you agree?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
oh mann.. really question whether nouns wants to be involved in issuing new governance tokens; putting the reg risks aside, seems like an opposite direction we would want to go wrt incentives,no? All the problems the dao is facing now stem from using this sort of model. Want to understand it better, tho. Any docs?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Asked bc post said beneficial owners kyc
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Who owns the LLC? do you think a tax-exempt Duna is inferior to this structure in any dimension?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
What does the erc20 do exactly? Assume you’re not selling the ability to define the categories?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
some people find auto insurance mandates onerous but many would opt in regardless. I guess it’s unclear to me if you’re questioning whether Nouns itself could incur meaningful liabilities or just whether those liabilities could be passed through to token holders?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
imo the fork broke or severely wounded the hyper-structure; duna is a step towards repair. It’s afaict the maximally elegant way to interface w the meatspace. Nonprofit>implicit partnership>cayman fc
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
🔥
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Divorciados
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
🔥
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
I guess the other option is editing a percentage linearly adjusts all other values; maybe this is already how it works? I think I like it looking like a histogram and you can adjust any single grantee’s bar and it automatically scales everything to 100%…
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Need dynamically updating sliders as ux so don’t have to do math (imagine thousands of white-listed grantees). Otherwise this is the way ♥️
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
agree/ have been personally thrilled with the level of conversation in here tbh. Maybe seems small in terms of #of posts and likes but personal sense is a well-articulated thought in here has a lot of value. obviously the potential impact of protocol design choices is unbounded . In any case y rugging not good..I figured goal was dao signals it as a priority and not to necessarily get a good return
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
hmm..maybe should redelegate
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction