Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g
@w-g
3 concerns the ‘fungibilization’ of treasury nouns (the swap/auction proposal is far less bad in this dimension and that had strong opposition) as a vehicle for speculation is non-accretive (solvable by allowing only dao to mint & issue as rewards) w/o governance rights or POW to own, how is this not a security?
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
w-g
@w-g
imo as nouners we should want a strong vote of confidence from foundation’s attorney that securities interpretation is wrong before considering as spec’ed- why wouldn’t we dress for the weather ?
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
