Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Is there any upside in opening the floodgates a bit to noundry/new traits admission? One route would be to add rarity vectors that could be determined by degree of support for each trait. imo There’s something interesting in not delineating the art by simple majority.. what if your tastes deviate from the hive?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

₿Ξnbodhi ✦⁺ ↗ 🎩ᖽ pfp
₿Ξnbodhi ✦⁺ ↗ 🎩ᖽ
@benbodhi
I’ve always felt like noundry needs its own auction/fork of nouns that celebrates each trait artist for that day, sharing revenue. Surfacing more and more art and creating a space for any nounish dao. Best of the best could be proposed to nouns. Nouns voters are pretty protective and we won’t see many new ones imo.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Coralorca pfp
Coralorca
@coralorca
I feel like nouns being CC0 with a lot of extensions/subprojects, the IP feels already quite "stretched". Might be on purist side but I want the main collection to be cohesive style-wise.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction