Content
@
0 reply
4 recasts
4 reactions
Varun Srinivasan
@v
What's the most annoying thing about building frames today?
34 replies
3 recasts
38 reactions
Justin Hunter
@polluterofminds
Images for interactivity is a super hacky experience. Sandboxed HTML would enable almost all the use cases people are hacking around today.
1 reply
3 recasts
31 reactions
Stephen Caudill
@mrmemes.eth
Big +1. Frames is slowly moving toward reimplementing a very small subset of existing web functionality. It would be great to see this get reoriented around using a safe/sanitized subset of something from the W3C working groups.
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I love frames, but the whole discussion often feels like a deja vu. Ladies and gentlemen, I present you WML! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_Markup_Language
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Jokes aside, the deck/cards model is an interesting one, @v.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
WAP/WML/WMLScript were dealing with a very similar problem set, and many smart people worked on them at the time. It's interesting to take a look at the spec, there are some great ideas in there.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction