Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
it is WILD to me that we only have allowlists for minting and NOT for secondary sales. that’s not how the trading of art, luxury goods, family heirlooms, homes, even surfboards works. most secondary marketplaces IRL have a curation layer to filter buyers. this is why NFT marketplaces lose volume to private txns :)
18 replies
5 recasts
56 reactions
🌹 zach harris 🥀
@zachharris.eth
@ted reading btw the lines private placement maxi
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
if you look at human history, most high-value asset transactions are done in private placement of some sort (eg Sotheby's). technology should be used to scale, increase access, and increase efficiency. allowlisting on NFT marketplaces scales private placements while increasing access and efficiency. its inevitable.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
The reason to have a private placement is to ensure the auction (when I'm saying I bid $100,000, I actually have it). Web3 does not need this. I think it's more probable that Sotheby's will go onchain and open up to everyone (with some KYC required by nation states).
2 replies
1 recast
2 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
good point, thanks for engaging in the discussion.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
🌹 zach harris 🥀
@zachharris.eth
@vrypan.eth or potentially buy https://www.joopiter.com/ which I gather are sometimes putting RWA on-chain
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
