Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
Voting has opened https://prop.house/purple/retroactive-funding-round-4
4 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Is this enforced? "No self-dealing or conflicts of interest: Purple holders should refrain from voting on sending funds to wallets where any portion of those funds is expected to flow to them, their projects, or anyone they have a close personal or economic relationship with."
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
Only via reputational damage
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
What Chris just said. Since this is a Prophouse vote the DAO already approved the funding onchain and now this prophouse is a signature only attestation without automatic settlement. We are trusting that the disbursement matches the voting and that also creates an opening to interpret the written rules. Not code.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I’m curious to see how this works out.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
This is at least the third retro funding via prophouse. So far no incidents or claims of self dealing iirc. I’m not sure how the timestamp of record for who can vote works nor how that’s enforced. 🤷🏻‍♂️
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction