Would you pay for a "pro" storage unit that gave you: 

- longer casts (10k chars)  
- upto 4 images or embeds per cast
- profile upgrades (link other socials, banner image etc) 

For creators, this would help level up their content and profiles. 

Assume it costs around $10/mo and revenue goes to weekly rewards.

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

Yes, but I think the $10/month is too steep, compared to the current pricing. Is it actually cost-related, or just price discovery?

Dad, geek, conversation liquidity provider. vrypan.net (home), @l--o--l (fun). devcoin:$lemon3

BTW, in this context, the "external cast data" FIP (i.e. a spec to embed data that are not stored in the protocol into casts) makes much more sense.

Also, media storage (photos) is something the client will usually pay. Once we have app-sponsored storage, it will make much more sense to have a client charge users for bundles that include both protocol, and app costs.

For example:

- The protocol allows for up to 10 embeds, and the cost is X.
- The app offers up to 10 images, or videos for Y.

The basic plan charged by the app is X, the pro plan is X+Y (and the app keeps Y).