Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Possible futures of the Ethereum protocol, part 4: The Verge https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/10/23/futures4.html
31 replies
146 recasts
1748 reactions
swampnet.base.eth pfp
swampnet.base.eth
@swampnet
The Purge
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DV (insert a lot of emojis) pfp
DV (insert a lot of emojis)
@degenveteran.eth
Thanks for this info Vitalik
0 reply
3 recasts
15 reactions
Jer | seattlecrypto.eth pfp
Jer | seattlecrypto.eth
@seattlecrypto.eth
πŸ‘€πŸ‘€πŸ‘€
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Kody pfp
Kody
@kody.eth
Spittin fire lately ser!
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Ren 🎩 Ⓜ️ pfp
Ren 🎩 Ⓜ️
@renatov.eth
We only loss on futures, it’s not important dex or cex, result it the same
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Ben pfp
Ben
@machinemiller
The ticker is VERGE
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Ivan pfp
Ivan
@ivananishchuk
Yes please! ZK verification for mainnet is needed badly. I still think sum-check/lookup based protocols are probably the best for this, but even the heavier schemes (plonk-ish or something?) should provide a lot of improvement over having to run the same computation over and over to verify.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ADITYA KUMAR pfp
ADITYA KUMAR
@yoyoadycool
Oow
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Shubham pfp
Shubham
@shubham-007
Demn demn, ur on fire mahn!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Andrian Sinigur pfp
Andrian Sinigur
@andrianus12
Omg😍
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
CryptoTBV pfp
CryptoTBV
@cryptotbv
Nice
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Shobiwan 🎩 pfp
Shobiwan 🎩
@shobi
The urge for the verge!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Siriusdog pfp
Siriusdog
@siriusdog
Thanks for the knowledge heads-up bro πŸ‘
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stakeados pfp
Stakeados
@stakeados
Tnk!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
TBJ pfp
TBJ
@gigipinturicchio
Positive!!!!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ymmot pfp
Ymmot
@ymmot
Nice
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
AC pfp
AC
@achi
in my imagination in the end all the L2 are merged into one, all in one (L1) will be back
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Bundala pfp
Bundala
@bundala
Where is your girl friend?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
If we go down the STARKed binary hash trees, why do we need a gas limit? If the burden is mostly on the builder+prover, let each builder build (or outsource) what they can (up to some limit on state growth/data-to-download). Any downside other than the obvious advantage to the big guy? Anything I missed?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction