Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
The voters banned banning banning banning charging too high rent. (To be clear I'm in favor of this, the best way to keep rent low is buidl buidl buidl)
37 replies
99 recasts
548 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
How do you solve for predictability/stability? If you buy a home, you lock in your costs for 5-30 years, why don't renters deserve some of that stability too so they can make longer term plans and set roots in their neighbourhood?
2 replies
1 recast
15 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
One answer: a big problem with the rent control approach is that it turns tenancy into a de-facto partial property right that is nontransferable. One fix: make it transferable. (If you take this path to its logical conclusion, you arguably eventually get Georgism) Another answer: a long-term commitment to keep housing prices low, eg. strict limits on zoning restrictions. Houston, Japan, etc seem to work quite well on that model.
2 replies
1 recast
25 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
I buy that long-term increasing desirable supply is a good way to reduce prices, but it's hard to swallow that it would be reliable for limiting rent volatility in the short/medium term. For example, immigration policy alone can easily eclipse any amount of buidl almost overnight. What does transferable rent control look like? The "control" stays with the tenant rather than the unit?
2 replies
1 recast
4 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Basically! You buy an NFT that lets you rent a particular place at $N/month for the next k years, and you have a highly liquid market for trading them. (And possibly government subsidies, paid for by property taxes, to give people these NFTs for free up to a certain standard of quality)
1 reply
1 recast
10 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
I'm into it, carry on!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
