Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
From a classical liberal perspective, Switzerland's governance seems utopian. Low taxes, good services even for low income people despite the low taxes, very decentralized government, and it really does seem true that "no one bothers to know who the president is". My big question: what's the catch?
27 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Like, what stops every other country from adopting a Swiss-style political system? (This is not a rhetorical question, I'm actually curious)
12 replies
1 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Possible hypotheses I have: 1. Swiss people are very high (IQ | conscientiousness | conflict avoidance | something) and the model would not translate to a culture that doesn't have those traits
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
2. There isn't much _interesting_ in Switzerland either: no Elon Musk, no big tech, no avant garde cultural movements... and the Swiss political system would not survive the pressures/conflict that would come from such things existing, or at least it would re-centralize in response to them
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
It’s a historical artifact of mountain country. Most mountainous regions are similar. The downside of not knowing your President is needing to know too much about neighbors. James Scott’s “The Art of Being Ungoverned” gets at tgese upland dynamics https://www.amazon.com/Art-Not-Being-Governed-Anarchist/dp/0300
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sturec
@sturec
small size and homogeneity may make it easier for the country to achieve consensus and stability.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
