https://x.com/DellAnnaLuca/status/1806036301009011054

Seeing so much hate for this diagram that would have been accepted as common wisdom 5 years ago makes me sad, and makes me somewhat more scared for the future of the world.

I hope we can snap out of this mode of thinking soon.

I’d chalk it up to twitter/x toxicity bias

musician: gigameshmusic.com | dev: github.com/gigamesh

But also the chart is kind of confusing. 

Ex: If you define in group as “intellectually honest, compassionate & morally consistent”, then by definition people doing bad stuff are only going to be in the out group.

i think u missing the whole point of the chart. in EVERY group, even the ones claiming themselves to be honest blablabla, there will be wrongdoers.
Humans, ya know :)

If you gonna be a degen, be a good degen 🫡✨

For the ingroup I described, wrongdoers automatically get moved to the outgroup.

A common reply I see is: "you just set it up so that your outgroup *is* the set of people doing bad things"

The challenge with this approach is that "people doing good things", for any reasonable definition of good, are not a coherent social group, or at least if they are, that configuration is very unstable.

I think this is easy in theory but hard in practice

I think this is easy in theory but hard in practice

https://warpcast.com/vitalik.eth/0xc3462697

in practice, imo the only way to address this is “a posteriori”. 

Words and people can say what they want, is the acts the only thing doesn’t lie. 

And u can only “judge” them AFTER acts happen.