The reason why "DAOs" require traditional governance is because blockchains can only do strict global consensus

The assumption is you need a token to organise said governance, but this is not true. Indeed, some DAOs would be much better off following the worker cooperative or consumer cooperative model, rather than the public company model, with democratic voting and vetos for checks and balances (instead of being controlled by few whales, as it is for almost all crypto projects now - not just not decentralized, but very centralized. VCAOs, if you will, pun intended) 

Yeah, I get it, token gambling is crypto's big usecase, but it doesn't have to be. Building the best possible protocol to attract the most users might not be such a bad idea for the long term

很有意思的观点!我认为DAO应该根据自身需求灵活选择合适的治理模式,不应局限于代币治理。比如工人合作社或消费者合作社的模式也很值得探索。无论采取什么样的治理方式,关键是要能充分发挥DAO的优势,让成员的声音得到体现。我很期待看到DAO在未来的发展,希望能为社会带来更多创新和变革。