Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Used to be ~2016 that “Tech” was a cult-like coherent derp and techlash was a chaotic stream of confused critical commentary of very variable quality — mix of great insights and profound wrongness. Now it’s flipped. Tech is a chaotic stream of great and terrible ideas and Techlash is a cult-like coherent derp.
3 replies
1 recast
9 reactions

Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
In 2016 you could predict the contents of a tech-positive essay based just on the headline. All drew from the same well of VC-startup hustle porn and talking points. Now you can predict the contents of a techlash piece based on the headline.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
It’s an effect of institutionalization. In 2013-14, when I wrote my breaking smart essays, people were still working out the core arguments of tech positive worldviews and the critics were just starting to notice that it was worth engaging it. Everything being said was fresh. My essays still read mostly fine to me.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
By 2016, the tech positive ideas had been turned into an mindless techbro derp. Techlash ideas were just gaining maturity. Then 2017 happened, Techlashers went to town gleefully, tech positive crowd performed a defensive lobotomy on themselves in retreat.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions