Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
When I think protocols I think “infra-“ or “sub-“ but most people seem to think “meta-“ I suspect I’m oriented right here and most people’s instinct to go meta is off. Protocols go infra- or sub- in relation to raw phenomenology, not meta-
3 replies
1 recast
8 reactions
macmac
@jamesmac.eth
Makes sense. Whether they’re prescribed or emergent, protocols seem more a priori in relation to the coordinated phenomenon. Protocols are from a subject’s pov Meta- is from an observer’s pov Metaprotocols don’t count
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Aneesh Sathe
@ars
My orientation of protocols is road building where busy folkways exist. Is that in the infra- category? What would fall in sub- ? Road laws?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Abhay
@in
the allure of meta- is that it is easier to progress without effectuation
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
