Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
hunter
@bfresh
“Does @arbitrum need another DEX/L2/L3/etc?” I say yes - for 2 reasons 👇 #1 - not every product is created the same If we want innovation, then we have to support all builders - not just 1 or 2. the small 1 man army today might end up being the 100 person team tomorrow. Everyone deserves a shot to make it, why not help them along the way. From a technical standpoint, just because something seems the same on the outside - doesn’t mean it’s developed the same. Fluid differs from Camelot which differs from Uniswap, etc
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vedaykin
@vedaykin
They’ll fork uniswap anyway right? The outcome would probably be less secure. I think one Dex „backend“ codebase is enough. Aggregators can exist many though.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
