Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

hunter pfp
hunter
@bfresh
“Does @arbitrum need another DEX/L2/L3/etc?” I say yes - for 2 reasons 👇 #1 - not every product is created the same If we want innovation, then we have to support all builders - not just 1 or 2. the small 1 man army today might end up being the 100 person team tomorrow. Everyone deserves a shot to make it, why not help them along the way. From a technical standpoint, just because something seems the same on the outside - doesn’t mean it’s developed the same. Fluid differs from Camelot which differs from Uniswap, etc
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

hunter pfp
hunter
@bfresh
#2 - distribution is everything @arbitrum should be everywhere, and accessible to everyone. CT isn’t the only place where users start their crypto journey. Points of distribution range far and wide, and to limit yourself to one product that may have one point of discoverability is a severe hindrance not only to yourself, but to the teams who build with you too.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vedaykin pfp
Vedaykin
@vedaykin
They’ll fork uniswap anyway right? The outcome would probably be less secure. I think one Dex „backend“ codebase is enough. Aggregators can exist many though.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction