Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/reframing
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Caden
@cbxm
welcome to FC, @vatika! same. 🫡 and i've got a theory i've been developing for a little while now — especially watching crypto folks speedrun the history of social media apps in the last couple years. in a word? "yearning." but in two words? "context collapse." and in twenty-four words? "oh no, i'm about to slaughter my poor, baby thesis by trying to boil it down to a cast thread on a saturday afternoon." let's get into it. 👇
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Caden
@cbxm
i'm gonna try to cut right to the meat, here — maybe i can skip the background or work backwards if i need to. so at the core of my argument is that what @vatika (and, really, all of us) wants is not MORE anonymity, but LESS. it's not we want to be able to *say whatever we want*. it's that we want *whatever we say to be understood*. https://warpcast.com/vatika/0xa2f7944b
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Caden
@cbxm
the problem with social media is that we can't read the room. you don't get to address your audience. when you post online, you have NO idea who you're talking to. this problem specifically is known as "context collapse", and in formal contexts, it's when "content intended for one audience leaks to another audience." but, disclaimer: i've been kind of co-opting "context collapse" as the umbrella term for this whole theory of mine, though, so i'm probably gonna refer to it that way, mostly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context_collapse
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Caden
@cbxm
the reason we like the feeling of jumping onto a new social media platform or starting an alt or joining a new discord server is that there's a brief window of time riiiiight at the start where you have a VERY high degree of clarity about: - what the group's niche is - how much the group knows about you - how they respond to that persona and (if your understanding of those elements aligns) you can usually get pretty positive engagement from that group, especially right at the beginning. "engagement" might be, idk, likes and recasts, sure — but let's even try reframing this onto something else entirely, like joining a city softball league. maybe "positive engagement" is being well-liked and having good chemistry with the team so that you get to play shortstop instead of outfield.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Caden
@cbxm
k, now that's great and normal and all... ...but now imagine you have to be that competitive, high-intensity person EVERYwhere — or you'll lose the shortstop position that you worked so hard to get. on campus, in the grocery store, at the f'king Red Lobster — if you're not a softball SAVAGE every time you step into public (the internet), well... then the team just might find someone else that IS (and unfollow you). so the result is that, in order to preserve the utility of our relationships, the "context" that gets collapsed is actually *us*. we begin to caricature-ize ourselves over time as we discover what things reliably yield the positive engagement that we're looking for. and the more that we value our position on the softball team, the more likely we are to be willing to compress our persona into that box.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Vatika
@vatika
And that's exactly why a new social media would/might allow you to grow outside that space which you've been compressed into by yourself, for so long. It's like entering college right after finishing school & being excited about starting anew as nobody here would know the school version of you.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Vatika
@vatika
But the thing is - the cycle repeats itself. It will be for a short period of time and after that, you'll find yourself compressed into a new niche and would probably want to break free again.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
