Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

vapeape pfp
vapeape
@vapeape
Should we raise, lower, or leave the fork threshold?
10 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
leave? wouldn’t be oppose to slight raise to 30%
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Salvino Armati ↑ pfp
Salvino Armati ↑
@salvino
higher
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

brennen pfp
brennen
@brennen.eth
Lower threshold, let them leave, keep the main branch clean
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Symbiotech⌐◨-◨🟡🎩テ pfp
Symbiotech⌐◨-◨🟡🎩テ
@symbiotech.eth
42% for the culture! In reality I agree with 40 at 30%
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

₿Ξnbodhi ✦⁺ ↗ 🎩ᖽ pfp
₿Ξnbodhi ✦⁺ ↗ 🎩ᖽ
@benbodhi
A raise might make sense at this point. I’m probably too smooth brained to figure out how far just yet though.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Salvino Armati ↑ pfp
Salvino Armati ↑
@salvino
raise
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
Raise to 30% or 40% and change time to join to 3 days after escrow. This is way too long.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

WNX pfp
WNX
@voadz
30%
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Toady Hawk 🟡 ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Toady Hawk 🟡 ⌐◨-◨
@toadyhawk.eth
30% feels like a safe change. Retains some of the emergency minority protection while also sending a message that Arb Round 2 wouldn’t be as easy.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

7858 pfp
7858
@7858.eth
Wow surprised at the global support for higher. Let’s solve book/treasury arb in some other way? If a faction splits off at 10% it’s an obscure sect If a good faith faction splits off with 40% support, high chance of rolling that momentum into canonical nouns status Better lots of little blowups than one big one
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions