Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/walletbeat
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
gm One of the upcoming attributes for Walletbeat is whether wallets integrate with immutable frontend technology. IPFS and/or ERC-6860 for web apps, or bundled fully-local frontends. Probably more options out there, but need to get off zero. https://x.com/LefterisJP/status/1894785187906789627
1 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
What does it mean for a wallet to "integrate IPFS"? It does 𝗻𝗼𝘁 mean "just forward all IPFS traffic to some random IPFS-over-HTTP gateway". All content hashes must be verified locally.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
nuconomy.⌐◨-◨
@nuconomy.eth
This is a tough one. For something like Safe, I’d think Local/IPFS build available. But for something like MetaMask or Rabby what would an IPFS distro even look like? Local build available still covers both cases. Might be better terminology though.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
I don't think you can really decentralise the extension code, because it needs some code anyway to pull the assets. Not sure if extensions support SW, if they do, then attaching a service worker to dynamically pull files would work perhaps there could be also an extension registry that serves extension artifacts on IPFS and when downloading it, you could manually verify CIDs
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
