carlcortright.eth ↑ ↑ ↑ pfp
carlcortright.eth ↑ ↑ ↑
@carlcortright.eth
What’s the current status of archival data on farcaster? Heard that hubs remove old posts if state gets bloated. Feels like there’s a need for an archival ETL. cc @dwr.eth @betashop.eth + other devs
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Jason Goldberg pfp
Jason Goldberg
@betashop.eth
We’re currently planning to maintain user history’s for them with Jam, even if protocol prunes. Will be looking for a decentralized storage solution with users having control over their storage. Open to ideas …
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
will you do this for users who don't use jam?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jason Goldberg pfp
Jason Goldberg
@betashop.eth
That was the thinking. We should discuss
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
What happens if they want to delete their data?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jason Goldberg pfp
Jason Goldberg
@betashop.eth
Yeah I think it’s important for users to be able to delete their data
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Do they have to create a Jam account to delete data? Even though they never signed up to use Jam?
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
And how would GDPR treat that?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
Feels like an important topic to explore. What else can and will clients do with our data that we have no visibility into and/or no control over? 🤔 💭
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jason Goldberg pfp
Jason Goldberg
@betashop.eth
Another idea is to make it a premium feature for jam users and delete the pruned data from non jam users A premium feature like this could also be introduced at the protocol level, opt-in Ideally though we would retain all casts though for search and prosperity purposes
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jason Goldberg pfp
Jason Goldberg
@betashop.eth
Shouldn’t have to
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction