Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Aaron Ullal pfp
Aaron Ullal
@uaaron.eth
Preaching web3 but using influence to revoke a channel using web2 godmode. Disappointing. https://twitter.com/JonnyFiat/status/1758190308855099496 /dont-do-this @rsa.eth @trustlessstate @dwr.eth
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Ryan Sean Adams (rsa.eth) pfp
Ryan Sean Adams (rsa.eth)
@rsa.eth
ok, that’s not what happened.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Aaron Ullal pfp
Aaron Ullal
@uaaron.eth
@rsa.eth if channels where decentralized, as they should be and as they will be, what would you have done?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ryan Sean Adams (rsa.eth) pfp
Ryan Sean Adams (rsa.eth)
@rsa.eth
considered purchasing it like an ENS or using another channel tag like banklesshq
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Aaron Ullal pfp
Aaron Ullal
@uaaron.eth
While #1 not technically feasible, why didn’t you go with #2?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Bankless was fine using another handle. I made the call because he violated the rules before decentralization and worse lied to me about it.
1 reply
1 recast
12 reactions

Aaron Ullal pfp
Aaron Ullal
@uaaron.eth
1. How will this be handled once channels will be decentralized? 2. How would you feel if ENS behaved similarly (imagining it would be technically feasible)? I’m in no way supporting the tweet’s author behavior, but words such as faith, lies, motives are exactly what i’d like to not care about. Code is law.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction