Warpcast

big fan of the new UI changes, I’m really liking the focus on channels and the slightly softer vibe overall!

I did notice the top line felt a little cramped due to the amount of elements and different font styles, and tightness on the right side of the channel pill, so i whipped up a quick mockup of some very small changes I’d make

> removed “in” 
> pushed timestamp next to kebab
> aligned kebab to vertical center
> added a couple pixels extra to the end of the channel pill 
> dropped font size of channel and timestamp 2 points from username font size

cc @horsefacts.eth @blockheim

I'm eth newbie..just learning
(working on @farcaster)

terminally.online

I like the prominence of channels, but dislike the visual flow, with 3(?) font-weights broken by channel art, @dwr.eth.

username | in | channelArt | channelName | timeStamp

Consider dropping the “in” or if the readability of “username in channelName” is important to you, avoid breaking the flow and simplify the text styles — possibly link the whole thing to the channel.

Nice eye, @heavygweit — how about making the spacing around numbered icons consistent so that the numbers don’t throw everything out of alignment when they’re there?

random facts and life excerpts. vulnerability is strength ✨🌈 fullstack & design, building /uno

Nice eye, @heavygweit — how about making the spacing around numbered icons consistent so that the numbers don’t throw everything out of alignment when they’re there?

https://warpcast.com/typo/0xc877577d

Collected by Aniko Berman, Sean Bonner, Jack Butcher, Emily Edelman, SHL0MS, Snowfro, and Michelle Thompson. New → https://manifold.gallery/coda

It’s most obvious with double-digit replies and no recasts (or vice versa) — because everything is fixed, the spacing appears inconsistent, even though it’s technically consistent when there are no numbers.

I haven’t noticed that! Do you mean if a cast has no likes, the spacing changes when the first like is added?