TXT pfp

TXT

@txt-nyc

53 Following
69 Followers


TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
Captured aura, with a twist?
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
The art object, per Seth Siegelaub: ‘There’s a whole social fabric…I think if one wanted to describe this manifestation graphically, you would say that an art object would be a rock in a pool and a various functionary levels going out from this rock would be dealers, critics, the museums, the media, a whole fabric or system, all barricading that little object.’ From the Open Hearing of the Art Worker’s Coalition (AWC), circa 1969. Graphic by @soulincode
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
How does the pattern of capital accumulation affect the art market? Can it be tweaked or rearranged? “It seems to me that the art market has a kind of secondary status in relation to the whole economy. It’s a playground for rich people, people who have extracted massive amounts of surplus cash through old-fashioned exploitation and want respectability and diversion. They have huge wads of cash, more than they can ever do anything with because inequality is at record highs, so they can spend amazing amounts on luxury goods.” -Ben Davis, Art Critic
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
It would seem that the art is the one thing that you have and the artist always has and which picks you out from anyone else. There’s a class of human beings who make art and a class who don’t, some of whom happen to be curators or museums directors or museum trustees. This is the way your leverage lies. - Seth Siegelaub From the Open Hearing of the Art Worker’s Coalition (AWC), circa 1969.
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
There’s a whole social fabric that rests very, very precariously on something we know as an art object, and art itself. -Seth Siegelaub From the Open Hearing of the Art Worker’s Coalition (AWC), circa 1969.
0 reply
2 recasts
3 reactions

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
Thank you, was wondering about this. It may have been a transcription error, as this came from an interview.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
Know where the levers lie.
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
A focus on the first transfer, finance as social practice, at point of entrance to the art market. How might this intervention play out? This and more coming soon in Circulation, an upcoming TXT publication experiment.
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
Truth from one half of White Pube.
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
More work from the recent TXT residency outside NYC, forthcoming in our publication titled Circulation. ‘Who are you, really? When given an option, what values would artists and their intermediaries choose for a market?’
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
Jerry Saltz on art market, circa 2007, ‘Seeing Dollar Signs’ in the Village Voice. ‘….a blend of economics, history, psychology, stagecraft, and lifestyle; an unregulated field of commerce governed by desire, luck, stupidity, cupidity, personal connections, connoisseurship, intelligence, insecurity, and whatever.’
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
Good time to share some work from the recent TXT residency. Artists vs Finance. Who wins? Does it matter? What’s the question?
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
0 reply
3 recasts
4 reactions

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
Part of the Artist’s Contract for Decentralized Art (ACDA): If royalty rule broken, initiate ‘reverse duchamp’. Will it work? TBD
0 reply
2 recasts
4 reactions

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
Thanks @trpplffct !
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
Fungible unit plays with non fungible token. Result?
1 reply
2 recasts
2 reactions

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
A publication on TXT work to date is coming together…
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
Still on the minds…
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

TXT pfp
TXT
@txt-nyc
Mapping, drawing, placing, thinking…
0 reply
2 recasts
3 reactions