Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tushar Soni
@tusharsoni.eth
Web2 companies pour so much money into perfecting checkout flows - A/B testing latency, clicks, UX, copy, colors for max conversion. So many payment options, that one is bound to work. In Web3, it's more like "pay or leave" Are you serious about your checkout flow? Then use paywithglide.xyz
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
Piyush
@314yush
I think it’s because in web2, users are ‘browsing around’ so you have to optimise for hooks to convert user but in web3, if a user is connecting wallet - you know they are going to use the product, all you need to do is simplify UX.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
love this! Unsolicited advice: Website looks great. URL is terrible. If youre gonna sacrifice .com for .xyz, definitely go single word. Also the "use" "paywith" usually doesnt recognize well even tho its used a lot. Rework it now to save a bigger hassle later?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction