Farcaster

I often see people Farcaster isn't "sufficiently decentralized".

You're free to define what "sufficiently decentralized" means to you, of course, but how we think about it is laid out in Varun's blog post.

I often see people Farcaster isn't "sufficiently decentralized".

You're free to define what "sufficiently decentralized" means to you, of course, but how we think about it is laid out in Varun's blog post.

https://www.varunsrinivasan.com/2022/01/11/sufficient-decentralization-for-social-networks

No issues with me on the "sufficiently decentralized" term. Makes sense IMO. 

I do feel focusing on making Farcaster as open as possible (DM's / channels) before find tuning the feed should be a priority though. 

If all clients have the same features, then we have X amount of projects building clients with similar features, each will get more users because of a fair playing field. 

End result is, more devs / clients / users able to "crack" the feed / spam issues. 

I'm reluctant, or should I say unable to use any other client full time without DM's and channel features. 

Would prioritising a level playing field here not be the better play for the whole ecosystem?

Fully Onchain Builder

https://www.apexdeployer.xyz/

Can't agree anymore. The reason for not opening up is profit, Warpcast wants to have this piece of cake alone.

Constant explorer |
Full stack developer | 
Building /bimoo …

Just do something that benefit Farcaster, not just benefit Warpcast. Otherwise it is the truth!

I understand there is still a lot of work to be done, but even a little progress is progress. Don't stand still.